ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2026
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): new insights 156 years after Charcot's masterful description.
Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Abstract: In 1869, Charcot and Alix Joffroy published the first detailed clinical and neuropathological description of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), establishing the correlation involving muscle weakness, atrophy, spasticity, and degeneration of the lateral corticospinal tracts. Charcot unified the involvement of upper and lower motor neurons into a single clinical entity. His pioneering description was limited to the motor system, reflecting the scientific constraints of his time. Charcot interpreted ALS primarily as a disorder of the motor system, a conclusion consistent with the clinical and pathological methods available in the late nineteenth century. Neurological investigation at that time relied mainly on detailed clinical observation, anatomical correlation at autopsy, and relatively-simple physiological techniques. These approaches were well suited to identify motor dysfunction but were far less capable of revealing subtle cognitive or behavioral alterations. Currently, ALS is recognized as a multisystem neurodegenerative disorder. Thus, Charcot's historical contribution was crucial for the initial understanding of ALS, while modern perspectives acknowledge its broader clinical complexity beyond the motor system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.