ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2026
Selective impairment of affective theory of mind in restless legs syndrome: a case-control study.
Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is traditionally considered a sensorimotor disorder, but increasing evidence suggests that it may also involve brain systems related to emotional and cognitive functions. In this exploratory study, we investigated whether individuals with RLS show differences in social cognition, particularly in the ability to interpret others' emotional expressions and mental states. Objective: To investigate social cognition in individuals with RLS, particularly affective theory of mind. Methods: We compared 22 individuals with RLS and 22 healthy controls matched for age, sex, and education. Participants completed standardized tasks assessing different aspects of social cognition, including affective theory of mind, which refers to the ability to infer others' emotions. Results: We found that individuals with RLS scored lower on the task assessing affective theory of mind. No significant differences were observed in other social-cognitive measures, although the relatively modest sample size may have limited the detection of subtle differences. The group difference in affective theory of mind remained significant after accounting for depressive symptoms. Conclusion: These preliminary findings suggest that RLS may be associated with alterations in affective theory of mind independent of depressive symptoms. This pattern may reflect involvement of limbic-striatal networks. Larger studies incorporating sleep-related measures are needed to better understand social cognition in RLS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.