ArticleCell genomics2026
Reporting and representation of population descriptors in public RNA-seq databases.
Article in Cell genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diverse and globally representative datasets are essential to genomic science and medicine. Here, we analyzed population descriptor metadata from RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) studies in two major public repositories: the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) and the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes. We examined geographic and economic characteristics of institutions depositing the data and compared SRA-deposited descriptors to empirical estimates of genetic ancestry and to those reported in publications, analyzing trends over time. We found that 55% of RNA-seq samples were deposited by United States (US) institutions and 90% by institutions in high-income countries. Only 3% of SRA samples were associated with population descriptors, and among those with US Census terms, 69% were labeled as White. Among samples with continental descriptors, 56% were labeled as European. Our analyses emphasize widespread bias in the composition of public RNA-seq datasets and, more generally, a lack of consistent and careful reporting of population descriptors needing urgent improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.