ArticleCell reports. Medicine2026
A large language model-driven multidisciplinary AI agent system predicts delirium in emergency critically ill patients.
Article in Cell reports. Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delirium occurs frequently in emergency departments and is associated with poor outcomes and increased burden. Early delirium risk prediction is crucial for timely prevention and intervention in emergency care, but most existing models focus on intensive care unit (ICU) populations and offer limited interpretability and interactivity. We propose DeLiriuMAgents, a large language model (LLM)-driven multi-agent system for predicting delirium risk in emergency critically ill patients. It simulates multidisciplinary clinical consultation by integrating data-driven, machine learning-based risk prediction; LLM-based virtual specialist reasoning in emergency medicine, neurology, and psychiatry; and medical evidence via retrieval-augmented generation to reach a final decision. In model development, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV is used for model derivation and internal validation; a multicenter Peking University (PKU) cohort from two hospitals in China and the eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD) cohort are used for external validation. It achieves accuracy/sensitivity/specificity of 0.749/0.762/0.747, 0.731/0.708/0.736, and 0.670/0.708/0.665 on MIMIC-IV, PKU, and eICU-CRD validation sets, respectively. Chart review and clinician evaluation verify the interpretability and usefulness of its reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.