ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Digital Decisions: Enhancing Chronic Disease Self-Care Through Digital Health and AI-Enhanced Decision-Making.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlabelled: Advances in digital health have dramatically changed how patients engage with their health. Rather than relying solely on periodic clinical visits, patients now have access to smartphones, patient portals, wearable devices, and mobile apps that provide support for day-to-day self-care decisions. This commentary discusses the findings of Longhini et al's systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of digital health interventions, which found modest improvements in self-care monitoring but limited effects on self-care maintenance and management behaviors. Reflecting on these findings through the lens of dual-process theory, digital health technologies appear to be effective at supporting fast, intuitive processes, such as symptom monitoring, but are less effective at engaging slower, deliberative processes needed for complex decision-making and behavior change. Digital health technologies should evolve from primarily supporting routine self-care activities to enhancing patients' reflective decision-making processes for sustained behavior change. Emerging AI capabilities offer opportunities to strengthen and bridge these fast and slow cognitive processes by translating complex health information into actionable insights and facilitating patient-clinician communication. Realizing this potential requires careful attention to implementation, including integration into clinical workflows, patient and clinician education, and digital literacy. In addition, digital health teams should adopt standardized implementation frameworks and outcome measures to generate a more robust evidence base. Lastly, human-centered design, patient engagement, and safeguards addressing bias, privacy, and transparency are foundational to ensure that the rapid pace of digital health technology will continue to enhance patient self-care and health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.