Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42594386›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2026

A scoping review of instruments measuring the implementation of the Health-Promoting School approach.

Stefano Delbosq, Kathelijne Bessems, Marta Branda, Kevin Dadaczynski, Gerjanne Vennegoor, Karina Leksy, Anne Torhild Klomstén, Veronica Velasco

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stefano DelbosqDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7977-3588
Kathelijne BessemsDepartment of Health Promotion, NUTRIM-Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3879-9279
Marta BrandaDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0009-0004-3055-7886
Kevin DadaczynskiFaculty of Human Science, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7367-5362
Gerjanne VennegoorDepartment of Health Promotion, NUTRIM-Institute of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6414-7445
Karina LeksyDepartment of Social Science, Institute of Pedagogy, University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5907-7836
Anne Torhild KlomsténDepartment of Education and Lifelong Learning, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0009-0002-3136-9700
Veronica VelascoDepartment of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1890-5564

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Health-Promoting School (HPS) is a holistic approach that addresses not only the curriculum but also policies, the physical and social school environment, and the school's external environment. Given its complexity in implementation, evidence on effectiveness is mixed. Adequately measuring the implementation of the approach is therefore essential for research and practice. This paper presents the results of a scoping review of instruments that measure the implementation of the HPS approach at the school level. The review was conducted using databases (Scopus, Web of Science, and EBSCO Global Health) and a survey targeting experts and stakeholders in school health promotion to collect unpublished instruments. The instruments were analysed with respect to the HPS components and health topics addressed, and implementation indicators. In total, 28 instruments were retrieved. Heterogeneity in instrument length, recipients, data collection methods, theoretical orientations, and methodological quality in the development and validation was observed. In relation to the HPS model, 'Healthy school policies' was the most frequent component, while 'School Social Environment' was the least addressed. Implementation indicators (implementation outcomes and steps in the implementation process) were present but were mostly not grounded in theoretical frameworks. Among the health topics, 'nutrition' and 'physical activity' were most frequently addressed for students, while 'relationships' was most often found for school staff. For the first time, the study provides an overview of existing instruments to capture the implementation of different components/indicators of HPS. Its results offer room for consolidation and further development of this emerging field.

Indexed as

Health PromotionSchool Health ServicesSchoolsExerciseHumansProgram EvaluationSocial Environmentassessment toolevaluationevidence-based health promotionHealth-Promoting Schoolsimplementationscoping review

Identifiers

PMID42594386
PMCPMC13472489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.