Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42594335›Full record

ArticleCancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center

Text Messaging as a Tool to Address Language Barriers in Cervical Cancer Screening Among Spanish-Preferred Populations: A Quality Improvement Study.

Brittany A Strelow, Emmarie Byom, Haley Wangen, Julia Backlund, Faith Van Erp, Lydia Wilson, Cynthia Herrera, Rachel Olson, Angela J Fought, Matt Shelden and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Brittany A StrelowDivision of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4858-3279
Emmarie ByomMayo Clinic Physician Assistant Program, Rochester, MN, USA.
Haley WangenMayo Clinic Physician Assistant Program, Rochester, MN, USA.
Julia BacklundMayo Clinic Physician Assistant Program, Rochester, MN, USA.
Faith Van ErpMayo Clinic Physician Assistant Program, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lydia WilsonMayo Clinic Physician Assistant Program, Rochester, MN, USA.
Cynthia HerreraMayo Clinic Physician Assistant Program, Rochester, MN, USA.
Rachel OlsonCenter for Learning Innovation, University of Minnesota, Rochester, MN, USA.
Angela J FoughtDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Matt SheldenDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Danielle O'LaughlinDivision of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundDespite advances in cervical cancer screening, cervical cancer rates have been increasing in the last decade. Hispanic women have higher cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates compared to non-Hispanic women in the United States. These disparities are primarily due to language barriers experienced in this Spanish-preferred population. Our study aims to improve cervical cancer screening rates among Spanish-preferred patients through a Spanish-language multimedia presentation on cervical cancer screening.MethodsIn patients not adherent to U.S. cervical cancer screening guidelines, we conducted a non-randomized study comparing standard care in Family Medicine (FM) to standard care plus a multimedia presentation with Spanish voiceover intervention in Internal Medicine (IM). We evaluated whether baseline characteristics differed between the two study arms using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and either the Chi-Square test or Fisher's exact test. For the primary goal, we examined whether there was a difference in screening scheduling rates between the intervention and standard care groups using the Chi-Square test. Using descriptive statistics, we investigated whether there was a difference in characteristics for those who scheduled screening and those who did not.ResultsWe had 52 patients in IM and 58 in FM, differing in age and insurance status, with median ages of 45.5 and 40.0, and percent insured of 65.4% and 82.8%. Post-study, 25.0% (13/52) in IM and 15.5% (9/58) in FM scheduled cervical screening appointments, which was not significantly different, p=0.21. Patients who scheduled screening had higher rates of insurance coverage, at 95.5% compared to 69.3%.ConclusionNo statistically significant difference in scheduling rates among Spanish-preferred patients was observed in this study. Further efforts should include larger samples and randomization.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersEarly Detection of CancerHispanic or LatinoText MessagingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality Improvementcancer preventioncancer screeningcervical cancerqualitywomen

Identifiers

PMID42594335
PMCPMC13473780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.