Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42594120›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Artificial intelligence-based grading of human cataracts: A feasibility study.

Catharina Latz, Franziska Rothen, Annika Licht, Katharina A Ponto, Alireza Mirshahi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catharina LatzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Marien Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8003-4547
Franziska RothenUniversity of Bern, Biomedical Engineering, Bern, Switzerland.
Annika LichtDardenne Eye Hospital, Bonn, Germany.
Katharina A PontoDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany.
Alireza MirshahiDardenne Eye Hospital, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This feasibility study developed and validated an AI algorithm for automatic classification of human lens opacification (cataracts) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT). The dataset comprised 1,802 unprocessed OCT images from 901 eyes, with cataract severity graded by slit-lamp examination using the Lens Opacities Classification System (LOCS) III. Nuclear opalescence (NO) was stratified as mild (≤3.0), moderate (3.5-4.0), or severe (≥4.5), while posterior subcapsular cataract (PSC) was classified as mild (<4) or severe (≥4). Nuclear color (NC) and cortical cataract (C) were not evaluated. After balancing, images were randomly divided into three sets: 70% for training, 20% for testing and 10% for validation. A convolutional neural network was trained five times. Patients had a mean age of 72 ± 8.8 years, with mean LOCS III grades of 3.81 ± 0.79 (NO) and 1.74 ± 1.55 (PSC). The AI achieved 60.3% accuracy for NO classification; among misclassifications, 34.9% were within one category, 4.8% were grossly inaccurate. PSC classification performed with 86.4% accuracy, yielding a true positive rate of 81.8% and a true negative rate of 90.9%. These results demonstrate the potential of deep learning for automated cataract grading.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCataractAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID42594120
PMCPMC13472358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.