ArticlePloS one2026
Who considers alternative employment pathways among International Medical Graduates in Canada?
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to examine which International Medical Graduates (IMGs) consider alternative employment pathways in Canada. IMGs are physicians whose country of practice differs from the country where they obtained their primary medical qualification. Due to the limitations and uncertainties of this career pathway, many IMGs opt for alternative career pathways (ACPs), which include non-physician roles that enable IMGs to apply their transferable knowledge, skills, and experience. This study aimed to analyze which IMGs choose alternative careers for job market integration in Canada. We carried out an anonymous, open online survey of IMGs living in Canada between November 2019 and June 2020. We recruited through IMGs-serving organizations, professional networks, social media platforms, and IMG champions. The survey collected information on sociodemographic characteristics, professional background, and consideration of ACPs. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regression were used to examine factors associated with ACP consideration. Of the 1,740 survey responses received, 1,210 respondents with complete information on the primary outcome were included in the analysis. Thus, the final sample used for this analysis included 1,210 responses from IMGs who were not currently working in clinical settings as partially/fully licensed physicians and who provided responses to our key question about considering ACPs. This sample included both those considering ACPs (683 respondents, 56.45%) and those not considering ACPs (527 respondents, 43.55%), enabling comparison between these two groups of IMGs in Canada. Among participants aged ≥ 50 years, the majority were considering ACPs (75.65%). Compared to migrants who had been in Canada for <3 years, participants with longer stays in Canada (>15 years) were less likely to consider ACP, OR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.47-1.43. An opposite trend in ACP consideration was observed between graduates within <3 years and earlier graduates (>15 years), OR: 3.41, 95% CI: 1.39-8.38. Despite persistent barriers and low residency match (13%-18%) in Canada, more than half of respondents reported considering alternative career pathways. IMGs aged 50 or older and those with longer time since graduation were more likely to consider alternative careers, whereas gender and length of stay in Canada were not significantly associated with ACP consideration. These insights from this study can guide targeted future support and career strategies to better facilitate IMGs' professional integration into the Canadian workforce, supporting their transition to fulfilling and meaningful employment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.