ArticlePloS one2026
Changing rounds into squares or combining stripes? In-depth analysis of Fritillaria flowers and the color-changing pattern of Sarcophaga flies sheds light on the diversity and morphogenesis of checkerboard patterns in Eukaryotes.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Colour pattern studies: the SE (せ) method, a shape-centred approach to explore biodiversity and avoid aesthetic biases.Quantitative plant biology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Important in many human artistic cultures, checkerboard patterns are rare in nature like many motifs based on squared geometry. Nevertheless, they are expected to be very detectable by the visual systems due to their periodic geometry and contrasted two-tone coloring, therefore potential specific biological functions are suspected. Here, thanks to a biological survey, we draw the first diversity landscape of eukaryotic species bearing checkerboard patterns, confirming their rarity but also their presence in extremely diverse clades. Then, we selected two genera, Sarcophaga flies and Fritillaria flowers, to perform in-depth pattern analyses allowing us to make strong hypotheses on the mechanisms producing these very peculiar patterns, as no morphogenetic process was known to generate checkerboards. Although they share a similar geometry, these two genera appear to produce checkerboards through very different ways, showing a convergence of shape but not of processes. Whereas the Fritillaria analysis points to a geometric constraining of a Turing-like pattern by the parallel network of veins, that of Sarcophaga suggest the reuse of developmental boundaries and right-left symmetry, together by the combination of vertical and horizontal stripes. Furthermore, we present the first description to our knowledge of the striking color-changing nature of Sarcophaga checkerboards, whose light and dark squares can exchange their color depending on the angles of lighting and observation thanks to the planar polarity of the cuticular hairs, the setae. Together, this shows the extent of the processes selected during evolution to generate complex forms and colors, and confirms the importance of studying morphogenesis with in-depth pattern analyses and through species diversity. Finally, by enabling strong hypotheses to be made about the morphogenesis of these patterns, it paves the way for the molecular identification of the morphogenetic processes at work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.