ArticlePloS one2026
Community-engaged passive tick surveillance highlights the diversity of ticks and tick-borne pathogens in Illinois.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The continuing increase in incidence of tick-borne illnesses in the United States necessitates expanded surveillance, especially in areas like Illinois experiencing range expansion of key vectors such as Ixodes scapularis and Amblyomma americanum. We report on the initial years (2018-2023) of a community-engaged passive tick surveillance program in Illinois designed to complement active collections by casting a wide net for tick species, tick-host encounters, and emerging pathogens. Participants submitted eight tick species, dominated by A. americanum, I. scapularis, and D. variabilis. Submissions, primarily adults, occurred almost year-round (except February), and were most often associated with humans, dogs, and deer. We used a microfluidic system and sequencing to test a subset of the submitted ticks. Six tick-borne pathogens were detected, including Borrelia burgdorferi s.s. (14% prevalence in adult I. scapularis), B. miyamotoi (4.7% in adult I. scapularis), and Anaplasma phagocytophilum (1.2% in I. scapularis as well as 1 out of 7 tested Dermacentor albipictus). We also documented spotted fever group Rickettsia species, such as R. amblyommatis (53% prevalence in nymphal A. americanum), R. montanensis (2.1% in D. variabilis), and Candidatus R. andeanae (in 2 out of 3 A. maculatum). These efforts helped document the year-round risk of tick exposure and expanded our knowledge of the diversity of ticks and circulating pathogens in Illinois. We believe the combination of a sustainable, low-cost passive surveillance program coupled with multi-pathogen assays can serve a useful function as complementary surveillance for emerging pathogens and changing tick distributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.