ArticlePloS one2026
Availability and representativeness of freshwater macroinvertebrate data to enable Europe-wide assessment of biodiversity trends.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
48 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Freshwater ecosystems, though covering less than 1% of Earth's surface, harbor around 10% of all species. Pressures like pollution, water extraction, and habitat loss can exhibit complex interactions in their effects on freshwater biodiversity. Understanding the effects of these pressures on ecosystem services and functions of freshwater systems is crucial for effective environmental policies, and asks for availability of species data. We therefore compiled European monitoring data on macroinvertebrates from European, national, and regional biomonitoring and analysed their representativeness with respect to river size, land use as well as their suitability to derive biodiversity trends. The dataset consists of over 2.3 million macroinvertebrate abundance records from 2010 to 2015, spanning 28 European countries. Geographically, data are concentrated in central Europe and England and are not evenly representative across space or river types. They vary regarding reporting units, general sampling methods, and taxonomic levels (mainly species level). These differences hamper European-scale biodiversity comparisons. The WFD primarily focuses on assessing the "ecological status" of water bodies, which can be achieved using a menu of methods and many biodiversity research questions require improvements in harmonization of taxonomic resolutions and in method standardization to enable accurate transnational comparisons. This study emphasizes the need for improved European coordination and support in collecting, validating, exchanging, and sharing freshwater biodiversity data to enable meaningful comparisons among countries. It also delivers an open-access database that enables analyses of trends and ecological scenario development, offering further opportunities to enhance freshwater biodiversity conservation and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.