Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42594095›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Interventions involving young people for health equity targeting the fossil fuel industry's practices and products: A realist review protocol.

Thilagawathi Abi Deivanayagam, Sandie-Marie Szawlowski, Sufiyan Abdul-Qayum, Araceli Camargo, Angela Fonso, Rachel Isba, Shweta Narayan, Audrey Prost, May van Schalkwyk, Delan Devakumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Thilagawathi Abi DeivanayagamInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1130-2333
Sandie-Marie SzawlowskiInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8793-8039
Sufiyan Abdul-QayumClean Air Southall and Hayes, London, United Kingdom.
Araceli CamargoThe Centric Lab, United Kingdom.
Angela FonsoClean Air Southall and Hayes, London, United Kingdom.
Rachel IsbaInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Shweta NarayanGlobal Climate and Health Alliance, Richmond, California, United States of America.
Audrey ProstInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
May van SchalkwykCentre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Delan DevakumarInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe fossil fuel industry's practices and products create wide‑ranging harms to human health, with disproportionate impacts on communities already affected by structural disadvantage. Young people, particularly adolescents, are among those most affected by these harms, yet they are often excluded from health and climate decision-making. At the same time, youth-led initiatives to counter the fossil fuel industry's practices and products are increasing globally. Despite this momentum, little is known about what interventions involving adolescents exist, how they work, and under what circumstances they may reduce health inequities driven by the fossil fuel industry. This study protocol aims to address this gap by conducting a realist review to explore how interventions involving adolescents can counter industry practices and products. It takes a structural racism lens to examine how inequities shape both exposure to harm and opportunities for participation. The review seeks to identify relevant interventions, understand the mechanisms through which they produce change, and examine the contexts that enable or hinder their effectiveness.

methodsThe study follows established realist review standards and draws on diverse sources of evidence, including published research and grey literature. Adolescents and a multidisciplinary expert steering group have contributed to shaping the review questions and will continue to be involved throughout the process. The review will generate explanations about how interventions work by developing context-mechanism-outcome configurations. These explanations will be refined through iterative synthesis and engagement with advisory groups. DISCUSSION: The review is expected to produce a set of theories illustrating how adolescents' participation can influence action against the fossil fuel industry to help reduce health inequities. The findings will inform public health practitioners, policymakers, organisations working with adolescents, and researchers seeking to design, adapt, or scale interventions that amplify adolescents' role in addressing the fossil fuel industry's health harms.

Indexed as

Fossil FuelsHealth EquityIndustryAdolescentHumansFossil Fuels

Identifiers

PMID42594095
PMCPMC13472360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.