ArticlePLOS digital health2026
AI-driven dual-task prediction model for co-stratifying efficacy and toxicity in NSCLC immunotherapy.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While effective against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), PD-1 inhibitors can induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs), occurring in up to 15.2% of patients and potentially fatal. Currently, effective predictive biomarkers capable of simultaneously forecasting both irAEs and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) responders remain elusive. This limitation hinders the safe clinical application of these agents. This study enrolled 333 advanced NSCLC patients treated with PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or combination therapy. CT imaging features were extracted using radiomics and deep-learning approaches. Three unimodal and two multimodal models were constructed to predict irAEs (Grade ≥3) and ICI responders in parallel. The SHAP algorithm was used to identify clinical features contributing to the prediction of both irAEs and ICI responders. The CDML-DenseNet model, integrating clinical features with deep-learning-derived radiomics features (DenseNet), demonstrated superior performance in predicting irAEs (AUC = 0.85), outperforming single-modal radiomics models. For ICI responder prediction, the CDML-DenseNet model achieved an AUC of 0.866. The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) was identified as a key feature in both irAEs and ICI responder prediction models. Patients who were non-responders to ICIs but experienced irAEs had significantly lower PNI (46.8 ± 8.779, P < 0.05) compared with ICI responders without irAEs. Our multimodal CDML-DenseNet model effectively predicts both irAEs and ICI responders in NSCLC patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors. This approach provides a novel framework for balancing immunotherapy efficacy and toxicity. Furthermore, the readily available and cost-effective PNI offers clinicians a practical tool to identify potential non-responders experiencing irAEs and to refine treatment decisions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.