ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Machine learning-based quantitative structure-activity relationship model for antibiotic prediction and discovery.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical global health problem that has become increasingly alarming in recent years. The discovery of new antibiotics is one approach for alleviating AMR, however, screening for novel drugs is time consuming and expensive. To accelerate antibiotic discovery, the integration of machine learning algorithms with Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) calculations could provide a rapid solution. Thus, this study combines a QSAR model and machine learning algorithms to predict antibacterial activities of potential novel drugs based on chemical information. Information on compounds that are reportedly active and inactive against bacteria was downloaded from the PubChem database and manually curated to create positive and negative datasets. The decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), and naïve Bayesian (NB) algorithms were employed to predict the antibacterial activities of chemical compounds from their Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System (SMILES) information. The models were then evaluated quantitatively and tuned. DT and SVM exhibited comparable predictive performance and outperformed the NB model, achieving accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and AUC-ROC values exceeding 0.90. DT was chosen for further analysis because of its simplicity and effectiveness. This revealed that descriptors relating to the electrotopology and β-lactam structures of compounds were the top contributors to model predictability. The model was then further tested against different classes of antibiotics and achieved high accuracy in all classes. The model is freely available as a web application at: https://antibacterial-predictor-model-ocogzqyibervrqb7trvfev.streamlit.app/.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.