Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42593818›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2026

Feeding and Husbandry Practices in Pet Ferrets (Mustela putorius furo): A Cross-Sectional International Study.

Erdem Danyer, Giada Morelli, Lorenzo Serva, Elena Dal Corso, Diego Cattarossi, Marianne Diez, Rebecca Ricci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erdem DanyerDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Padua, Legnaro, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7922-7384
Giada MorelliDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Padua, Legnaro, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5424-4164
Lorenzo ServaDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Padua, Legnaro, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0660-9637
Elena Dal CorsoDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Padua, Legnaro, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-7558
Diego CattarossiClinica Veterinaria Casale sul Sile, Casale sul Sile, Treviso, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5017-4381
Marianne DiezDepartment of Veterinary Management of Animal Resources, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6999-9380
Rebecca RicciDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Padua, Legnaro, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5678-9555

Funding

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye 1059B192300618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe domestic ferret (Mustela putorius furo) is an increasingly popular non-traditional companion animal; however, limited information is available on how caregivers manage feeding and husbandry practices.

objectivesThis study aimed to investigate feeding and management practices in pet ferrets and to evaluate differences among countries.

methodsA cross-sectional, multilingual (Italian, English, French) online survey data collected from 495 ferret caregivers, mainly from France, Italy, the United States, the United Kingdom and Belgium. RESULTS AND

conclusionsMost ferrets were young adults, neutered (70.7%) and housed indoors (87.3%). Neutering practices differed significantly among countries, with surgical sterilisation more common in the United States and the United Kingdom (p < 0.001). Husbandry practices generally included daily free-roaming and environmental enrichment; however, undesirable behaviours were frequently reported, particularly inappropriate elimination (79.0%) and food hiding (75.4%). Preventive veterinary care was common, although vaccination and parasite prevention rates were lower in the United Kingdom and the United States compared to continental Europe (p < 0.001). Feeding practices were highly variable. Dry commercial diets were the most commonly used (72.1%) and were typically offered ad libitum, while homemade diets were provided by 44.2% of caregivers and whole prey by 25.9%. Inconsistencies included use of products formulated for other species. Overall, husbandry and feeding practices varied considerably across countries. The wide variability in feeding approaches, inconsistent preventive care and lack of evidence-based nutritional guidelines may increase the risk of nutritional imbalances and health issues, highlighting the need for clearer recommendations and improved caregiver education.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryFerretsPetsAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleMaleUnited Statesbody conditionexotic petsferret feedinghusbandrysurveywelfare

Identifiers

PMID42593818
PMCPMC13472074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.