ArticleEndocrine connections2026
Artificial intelligence in thyroid nodules and cancer: clinical validation and real-world performance.
Article in Endocrine connections, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thyroid nodules are detected in a large proportion of adults undergoing high-resolution ultrasonography, yet only a minority harbor clinically significant cancer. The clinical problem is therefore not only cancer detection but calibrated risk stratification: avoiding delayed diagnosis of aggressive disease while limiting unnecessary biopsies, molecular testing and diagnostic surgery. Artificial intelligence (AI) has moved rapidly from experimental image classification to clinically deployed decision support. This invited review synthesizes current evidence for AI applications in the evaluation and management of thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer, emphasizing ultrasound-based computer-aided diagnosis, indeterminate cytology, molecular integration, cytopathology and histopathology, lymph node assessment, report quality control, surveillance and emerging multimodal large language models. Commercial and near-commercial systems, including S-Detect, AmCAD-UT, Koios DS Thyroid, AIBx and newer deep-learning systems, show that AI can improve consistency, support less experienced readers and, in selected settings, reduce low-yield fine-needle aspiration without unacceptable loss of sensitivity. A particularly important future role may be AI-enabled de-escalation, in which image-derived estimates of benignity help support surveillance when clinical, sonographic, cytologic or molecular risk signals are concordantly low. However, performance varies by case mix, cancer prevalence, scanner platform, operator experience, geographic cohort, reference standard and whether the model is used as a stand-alone classifier or second reader. The strongest evidence supports AI as an adjunct to standardized ultrasound risk stratification and shared decision-making, not as a replacement for expert clinical judgment. Future progress will depend on prospective multicenter validation, transparent reporting, local calibration, workflow design, regulation, post-market surveillance and assessment of patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.