ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2026
Validation of a novel prognostic staging system for breast cancer incorporating age at diagnosis.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAge at diagnosis is an independent prognostic variable for breast cancer-specific and overall survival (OS). We previously developed a novel prognostic staging system that incorporates age and demonstrated refined risk stratification compared with the current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging schema. We now aim to externally validate this staging system.
methodsThe National Cancer Database was used to identify adult females diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2010-2015. Women with prior malignancy, unknown vital status, or unknown AJCC clinical prognostic stage (CPS) variables were excluded. Serial multivariable Cox's proportional hazards models evaluated associations between OS and CPS +/- age +/- effect modification (CPS by age interaction). Models were evaluated using concordance index (C-index).
resultsAmong 663,659 patients, the median age was 60 years (IQR 51-70) and the median follow-up was 91.3 months. At last follow-up, 133,273 patients (20.1%) were dead. The model that incorporated both age and effect modification had the highest C-index (0.7852, versus 0.6881 for the model excluding age and 0.7847 for the model without effect modification), indicative of the best predictive performance. Using this model to predict OS stratified by CPS showed differential survival across the age spectrum, consistent with the initial model. Within each stage group, women diagnosed at age 40 had the best survival, whereas women at the extremes of age had inferior survival.
conclusionThis analysis provides external validation of our novel prognostic staging system for breast cancer. Future editions of AJCC may consider incorporating age to achieve more accurate survival predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.