ArticleExperimental brain research2026
Trajectory elevation in reach-to-grasp movements under increased arm weight and repeated trials.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study examined how three-dimensional upper-limb movement trajectories are modulated by changes in gravitational load. We hypothesized that individuals adopt a trajectory elevation strategy in reach-to-grasp movements performed on a desk to compensate for increased movement variability arising from motor noise. To increase motor demands and create conditions under which trial-related fatigue effects could emerge, we manipulated arm weight and used an extended repeated-trial protocol. Participants completed 400 reach-to-grasp trials under three weight conditions (0 g, 200 g, and 400 g), with weights applied to the forearm during the middle 300 trials in the 200 g and 400 g conditions. From the first weighted block-when substantial muscle fatigue was unlikely to have developed-maximum trajectory height was greater in the weighted conditions than in the 0 g condition. Across trials, trajectory height gradually decreased in the 0 g and 200 g conditions, whereas a slight increase was observed in the 400 g condition. In the 400 g condition, trajectory elevation across trials was positively correlated with trajectory variability in later trials. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that trajectory elevation may serve as a strategy to mitigate detrimental effects on task performance caused by fluctuations in motor output, whether arising from added weight or trial-related fatigue effects. Additionally, exploratory analyses examined the effects of within-day repeated practice on aperture control during reach-to-grasp movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42593673What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.