Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42593667›Full record

ArticleDermatology and therapy2026

Oral Retinol, Alone or Combined with Medical Photoprotection, in Patients with Actinic Keratosis: A Randomized, Open-Label, Prospective, Multicentric Study.

Marco Ardigò, Martina Burlando, Elena Campione, Gianluca Nazzaro, Giulio Foggi, Francesca Colombo, Stefano Alfano, Massimo Milani, Angelo V Marzano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marco ArdigòDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.
Martina BurlandoDermatology Unit, IRCCS San Martino University Hospital, Genoa, Italy.
Elena CampioneDermatological Clinic, Department of Systems Medicine, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Gianluca NazzaroDermatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Giulio FoggiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, MI, Italy.
Francesca ColomboMedical Department, Cantabria Labs Difa Cooper, Caronno Pertusella, VA, Italy. francesca.colombo@difacooper.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8099-0192
Stefano AlfanoMedical Department, Cantabria Labs Difa Cooper, Caronno Pertusella, VA, Italy.
Massimo MilaniMedical Department, Cantabria Labs Difa Cooper, Caronno Pertusella, VA, Italy.
Angelo V MarzanoDermatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Funding

Cantabria Labs Difa Cooper unrestricted grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionActinic keratosis (AK) is a chronic ultraviolet-induced condition with potential progression to squamous cell carcinoma. This study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of oral retinol, alone or combined with broad-spectrum medical photoprotection containing piroxicam, in patients with mild-to-moderate AK.

methodsIn this multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label study, 117 patients with up to six AK lesions were assigned to oral retinol 50,000 international units (IU)/day (group A), oral retinol plus medical photoprotection (group B), or standard photoprotection recommendations (group C). Treatment lasted 6 months, followed by 3 months of follow-up. Assessments were performed at baseline and at months 3, 6, and 9. The primary endpoint was change in Actinic Keratosis Area and Severity Index (AKASI). Secondary outcomes included global clinical efficacy, lesion clearance, tolerability, and exploratory line-field confocal optical coherence tomography findings.

resultsAll 117 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, and 99 in the per-protocol analysis. AKASI scores decreased significantly in group A at month 6 by - 19.3% (mean difference (MD) 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11-1.11; p < 0.05) and at month 9 by - 22.5% (MD 0.71, 95% CI 0.18-1.25; p < 0.01). In group B, significant reductions were observed at all time points (T3: - 24.1%; MD 0.90, 95% CI 0.42-1.39; p < 0.0001; T6: - 34.9%; MD 1.31, 95% CI 0.86-1.76; p < 0.0001; T9: - 38.8%; MD 1.45, 95% CI 0.95-1.95; p < 0.0001). No significant changes occurred in group C. Reductions were earlier and greater with the combined strategy. Global clinical efficacy was rated good or very good in 69% of patients in group A and 88% in group B, while lesion clearance rates were 56% and 82%, respectively. Tolerability was generally good, and no treatment-related adverse events were formally recorded. In the imaging substudy, significant reductions in epidermal and stratum corneum thickness occurred only in group B.

conclusionsOral retinol combined with medical photoprotection was associated with earlier and greater improvements than oral retinol alone or standard photoprotection recommendations. These findings support further controlled studies to confirm efficacy and clarify the contribution of each intervention.

trial registrationTrial registration number ISRCTN42565762, retrospectively registered on 18 May 2026.

Indexed as

Actinic keratosisAKASI scoreMedical photoprotectionOral retinol

Identifiers

PMID42593667
PMCPMC13558533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.