ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Positive surgical margins after partial nephrectomy across changing surgical eras: long-term oncological results from a tertiary referral center.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeto reassess the prognostic value of positive surgical margins (PSM) after partial nephrectomy (PN) in terms of relapse-free survival (RFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM) within a large cohort spanning changing surgical eras, including the progressive adoption of minimally invasive approaches. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 1441 patients who underwent PN for cM0 renal tumors between 2000 and 2024 at a tertiary referral center. Patients were stratified according to margin status (PSM vs. negative surgical margins, NSM). Kaplan-Meier analyses estimated RFS, PFS, and OS, while uni (UVA)- and multivariable (MVA) Cox regression models stratified by surgical era (2000-2011 vs. 2012-2024) tested the association between PSM and local relapse, progression, and all-cause mortality. Fine-Gray regression tested PSM impact on CSM. Then, exploratory interaction and subgroup analyses according to surgical approach were also performed.
resultsOf 1441 included patients, 81 (5.6%) had PSM on final pathology. Apart from a higher proportion of females in the PSM group (42% vs. 31%, p = 0.03), no clinical or pathological differences were observed between PSM and NSM (all p > 0.1). At 5-year follow-up, RFS, PFS, and OS were 90.5% vs. 96.7% (p = 0.003), 94.9% vs. 94.4% (p = 0.7), and 91.3% versus 94.4% (p = 0.1) for PSM vs. NSM, respectively. After adjustment for the selected clinical variables, PSM were associated with higher hazard of local relapse (HR: 4.03, 95% CI: 1.64-9.87; p = 0.002). No statistically significant association was observed between PSM and systemic progression (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.35-3.74; p = 0.8), all-cause mortality (HR: 1.96, 95% CI: 0.82-4.72; p = 0.1), or CSM on Fine-Gray analysis (SHR: 2.66, 95% CI: 0.58-12.1, p = 0.2). However, the number of progression and mortality events in the PSM group was limited, resulting in wide CIs.
conclusionsPSM after PN were independently associated with a higher risk of local recurrence. No statistically significant association was observed with systemic progression, CSM, or OS; however, these analyses were limited by the small number of events, and clinically meaningful effects cannot be excluded. These findings support careful postoperative surveillance while larger contemporary studies are needed to better define the long-term prognostic impact of PSM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42593572What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.