ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026
Validation of the AO Spine Osteoporotic Fracture Classification-effect of geographical region on reliability and reproducibility.
Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regional differences affect the reliability of the AO Spine-DGOU Osteoporotic Fracture Classification. European participants showed the highest agreement. This study underscores the need for addressing regional factors to improve the system's global clinical utility. PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of geographic region on the reliability and reproducibility of the AO Spine-DGOU Osteoporotic Fracture Classification System.
methodsThis study included 320 participants from various global regions who classified 27 cases of osteoporotic vertebral fractures using the AO Spine-DGOU system which categorizes the fractures to 5 subtypes (OF 1-OF 5). Participants underwent training via an online webinar. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility were assessed using Fleiss' kappa coefficient, and agreement with a gold standard committee was evaluated.
resultsThe classification system showed moderate to substantial agreement with the gold standard globally (initial kappa 0.58, improving to 0.61). European participants had the highest agreement (kappa 0.64 and 0.66). OF4 fractures were most accurately classified, while OF3 fractures showed the least agreement. Intraobserver reliability was highest among European participants. Post hoc analysis indicated significantly better reliability among German-speaking participants compared to other Europeans (kappa 0.79 vs. 0.70, p = 0.0026).
conclusionThe AO Spine-DGOU Osteoporotic Fracture Classification System demonstrates moderate to substantial reliability and reproducibility, with regional differences influenced by factors such as training and clinical experience. This underlines the necessity of proper education adapted to the regional particularities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42593511What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.