ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
Gender disparities in the treatment and outcome of osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral fractures - results from the prospective EOFTT multicenter study.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOsteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) present varying treatment challenges depending on fracture severity, stability, and patient characteristics. While the OF classification system guides treatment decisions, gender differences in OVF management and outcomes remain underexplored. RESEARCH QUESTION: How do treatment strategies and clinical outcomes differ between genders?
methodsThis secondary analysis utilized prospective data from the German multicenter EOFTT study, including 518 patients (390 females, 128 males) treated for thoracolumbar OVF. Outcomes assessed included adherence to OF score recommendations, pain levels, functional performance (Timed Up & Go test, Barthel Index, Oswestry Disability Index), and rates of anti-osteoporotic therapy (aoTh). Statistical analyses included generalized linear mixed models and repeated-measures general linear models, with therapy type as a covariate.
resultsGender did not influence overall treatment choice; however, men more frequently underwent instrumentation, while women received augmentation procedures. AoTh administration was significantly lower in men at discharge (72% vs. 82%, p = 0.017) and follow-up (71% vs. 89%, p < 0.001). Both genders showed significant improvements in pain, mobility, and functional outcomes over time (p < 0.001), with no gender-specific differences. Adherence to OF score recommendations was 61% with no gender disparity. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionAlthough gender had minimal influence on pain and functional recovery, marked differences in surgical strategies and the administration of anti-osteoporotic therapy underscore potential disparities in the surgical treatment of women and the management of osteoporosis in men. Addressing these disparities through tailored screening, optimized adherence to guidelines, and individualized treatment strategies may improve outcomes in OVF management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42593510What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.