Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42593509›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Mitigating radiation in robotic-assisted sacropelvic screw placement using 3D magnetic resonance imaging.

Giuseppe Loggia, Fedan Avrumova, Marco D Burkhard, Michael J Kelly, Franziska C S Altorfer, Joseph Iii C Babrowicz, Allison S Lowe, Jiaqi Zhu, Ek T Tan, Joseph L Chazen and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Giuseppe LoggiaDepartment of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA. giuseppe.loggia@gmx.ch.
Fedan AvrumovaDepartment of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Marco D BurkhardDepartment of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Michael J KellyDepartment of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Franziska C S AltorferDepartment of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Joseph Iii C BabrowiczDepartment of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Allison S LoweDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Jiaqi ZhuCenter for Biostatistics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Ek T TanDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Joseph L ChazenDepartment of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA.
Darren R LeblDepartment of Spine Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, USA. research@leblspinemd.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of robotic-assisted (RA) sacropelvic screw placement (SPSP) using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3D MRI) for preoperative planning and robotic registration. SPSP is a critical component of spinal fixation but is subject to trajectory deviations, and radiation exposure with fluoroscopic or computed tomography (CT)-based navigation. CT-like 3D MRI-based navigation provides radiation-free preoperative imaging, but its integration with RA systems remains unexplored in SPSP.

methodsEight human cadavers underwent RA SPSP using MRI-based preoperative planning, including the placement of S1 pedicle screws, S1-alar-iliac (AI) screws, and S2-AI screws bilaterally. Accuracy was measured as deviation between planned vs. achieved trajectories by postoperative CT analysis. This was quantified through direct measurements and subsequently categorized using the Gertzbein-Robbins Scale (GRS).

resultsA total of 48 screws were placed using 3D MRI-based RA navigation. Postoperative CT confirmed that 46 screws (95.8%) were graded as GRS Grade A. Among the S1 pedicle screws (n = 16), the median deviation from the planned trajectory was 0.5 mm (IQR 0.3-0.8) in the axial plane and 0.8 mm (IQR 0.5-0.9) in the sagittal plane. For S1AI and S2AI screws (n = 30), the median deviation at the entry point was 0.7 mm (IQR 0.3-1.2), while the median axial deviation from the medial SI joint border measured 0.9 mm (IQR 0.6-1.7).

conclusionThis first cadaveric validation of 3D MRI-guided RA sacropelvic fixation demonstrates the feasibility of radiation-free preoperative imaging and robotic registration for precise trajectory execution.

Indexed as

Image-guided surgeryMagnetic resonance imagingPelvic bonesRadiation exposureRoboticsSacrumSpinal fusion

Identifiers

PMID42593509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.