ReviewEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2026
Experiences and satisfaction with intensive community care services for children and adolescents with severe mental health disorders: a mixed-methods systematic review.
Review in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intensive community care services (ICCS) are community-based alternatives to inpatient care for young people with severe mental health disorders. This systematic review investigated the experiences and satisfaction associated with ICCS. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to August 2025 for studies on children and adolescents under 18 years receiving mental health care from ICCS. Primary outcomes were experiences and satisfaction from the young people, parents, or clinicians. Quantitative satisfaction data were qualitised before integrating with qualitative data. The synthesis used a meta-aggregative approach to produce statements to inform practice. Nine studies from eight articles were included: two qualitative, three mixed-methods, and four quantitative studies. No studies examining clinician experiences were identified. Positive experiences were generated when ICCS: (a) provide structured emotional and practical support to caregivers; (b) facilitate strong therapeutic relationships across the young person-family-clinician system through frequent, flexible, and community-based contact; (c) offer multidisciplinary expertise and specialist interventions; (d) support sustained improvements beyond treatment by embedding therapeutic work in real-world contexts; (e) actively manage extra-therapeutic factors and family involvement to avoid undermining young people's autonomy or sense of agency. Parents were particularly satisfied with ICCS due to accessibility, responsiveness, intensity of contact, and reduced hospitalisation. ICCS models successfully generate positive experiences in service users. Satisfaction was generally higher than routine care and particularly pronounced amongst parents. Future studies should explore staff perspectives and specific elements of satisfaction. These findings have implications for service design, workforce training, and balancing family involvement with young people's autonomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42593487What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.