ArticleSpecial care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry
Are Dental Students in Saudi Arabia Prepared to Diagnose and Manage Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate?
Article in Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the knowledge and preparedness of dental students regarding Cleft lip and palate (CLP) and to utilize qualitative inquiry in Phase II to explain the educational factors influencing clinical competency (measured via theoretical management skills) and knowledge retention (measured via etiology recall).
methodsA sequential explanatory mixed-methods study was conducted at Umm Alqura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Phase I involved a cross-sectional survey of 129 clinical dental students and interns to assess demographics, theoretical knowledge, and attitudes toward CLP care. Phase II involved semi-structured interviews with a stratified purposive sample to explore barriers to learning and confidence. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inferential tests (Chi-square and independent t-tests), while qualitative transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsQuantitative findings showed that while 85.2% of students recognized clinical features, significant deficits existed in etiology; only 35.9% correctly identified smoking as a risk factor. Students with clinical exposure achieved higher knowledge scores (7.94 ± 3.70) compared to non-exposed students (7.14 ± 2.89) yet demonstrated high variance in performance. Qualitative analysis explained these disparities through five emerging themes: (1) "knowledge decay" of pre-clinical sciences not reinforced in later years; (2) clinical exposure often limited to "passive observation" rather than active engagement; (3) anxiety regarding patient counseling due to a lack of practical communication training; (4) uncertainty regarding treatment sequencing and the optimal timing for interventions; and (5) ambiguity regarding the general dental practitioner's specific role and responsibilities within a multidisciplinary cleft palate team.
conclusionCurrent educational models relying predominantly on isolated didactic instruction and passive observation may not be entirely sufficient for fostering complete CLP competency. The findings suggest a curriculum revision emphasizing vertical integration and active, case-based learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.