ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2026
Real-world Effectiveness and Safety of Lebrikizumab in Atopic Dermatitis: A TREATgermany Analysis.
Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is driven by type 2 inflammation, with interleukin-13 (IL-13) as one of the central operators. Lebrikizumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits IL-13 signalling. Adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD who received lebrikizumab in the TREATgermany registry until 12/2024 were selected, and patient characteristics as well as effectiveness and safety outcomes after 1, 3 and 6 months were evaluated. A total of 108 patients were initiated on lebrikizumab, with 80 having follow-up data available for this analysis ("registry cohort"). Forty-one patients were switched to lebrikizumab without a "washout period" from another advanced systemic therapy ("switchers"). The mean Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) decreased from 14.8 at baseline to 5.6 and 3.0 at month 3 and month 6 and was comparable between switchers and nonswitchers. Clinically meaningful improvements were also seen across all patient reported outcomes (PROs) equally in both groups, e.g. a decrease of the mean peak pruritus numeric rating scale (PP-NRS) from 6.6 to 3.8 and 3.4 and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) from 11.9 to 4.9 and 4.8. Overall, adverse events (AEs) were reported for 26.6% of patients within the first 3. The most frequently reported AE was conjunctivitis or other ocular complications, reported in 13 patients (20.3%). 32 patients (40%) had an initial EASI≥16 and were comparable to patients in lebrikizumab phase 3 studies. In this "trial-like" cohort, EASI-75 and EASI-90 response rates were 60% and 26.7% at month 3 and 70% and 50% at month 6. Lebrikizumab shows effectiveness in routine care well comparable to observations made in randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.