ArticleWorld journal of surgery2026
Aligning Open-Access Surgical Education With Need: Curriculum Coverage and Gaps in the United Nations Global Surgery Learning Hub (SURGhub).
Article in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Aligning Open-Access Surgical Education With Need: Curriculum Coverage and Gaps in the United Nations Global Surgery Learning Hub (SURGhub).World journal of surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe United Nations Global Surgery Learning Hub (SURGhub) is a community-led, open-access digital platform providing quality-assured surgical education, particularly in low-resource settings. However, growth in course numbers and learner reach does not necessarily ensure balanced coverage of competencies required in early training. We mapped SURGhub content against selected early training curricula to identify priority gaps and establish a baseline for educational improvement.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional curriculum mapping study of SURGhub courses available in January 2026. Courses classified as Level 1 or 2 were mapped against selected benchmark curricula in surgery, anesthesia, obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN), and perioperative nursing. Reviewers applied a three-component rubric assessing relevant content quantity, coverage breadth, and early training essentiality. Component scores were summed to produce a total score from 0 to 6, with domains classified as critical, high-, moderate-, or low-priority curriculum gaps.
resultsA total of 82 eligible courses were evaluated across 99 curriculum domains. Mean domain scores were highest for surgery at (3.67/6), followed by anesthesia (2.53), OBGYN (0.84), and perioperative nursing (0.83). Coverage was broad but uneven. Practical perioperative topics, trauma, patient safety, and procedural skills were better represented than foundational sciences and several specialty-specific clinical domains. Critical gaps were identified in one of 12 surgical domains, five of 19 anesthesia domains, eight of 12 perioperative nursing domains, and 37 of 56 OBGYN domains.
conclusionsSURGhub demonstrates the potential of open-access, low-bandwidth digital education to expand access to surgical learning globally, but Levels 1 and 2 course coverage was uneven across selected benchmark curricula. Approximately two-thirds of evaluated OBGYN and perioperative nursing domains were classified as critical gaps. This mapping establishes a baseline for curriculum-aligned content commissioning and repeated evaluation. Future research should evaluate course uptake, completion, and learner outcomes following targeted content development while maintaining attention to accessibility, engagement, and equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.