Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592803›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS2026

Early Experience With Robotic Kidney Transplantation With Left-Sided Graft Implantation: Technical Considerations and Short-Term Outcomes.

Diego F Chaparro-Zaraza, Haaris Kadri, Amen Kiani, Rossana Maffei, Paolla Hampel, Angela Hill, Neeta Vachharajani, Brendan P Lovasik, Adeel S Khan, Phillipe Abreu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Diego F Chaparro-ZarazaSection of Abdominal Transplant, Department of General Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1716-9000
Haaris KadriUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4381-5635
Amen KianiSection of Abdominal Transplant, Department of General Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1958-4926
Rossana MaffeiDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8218-2723
Paolla HampelSection of Abdominal Transplant, Department of General Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Angela HillSection of Abdominal Transplant, Department of General Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5577-1078
Neeta VachharajaniSection of Abdominal Transplant, Department of General Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4115-2200
Brendan P LovasikSection of Abdominal Transplant, Department of General Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3750-6933
Adeel S KhanSection of Abdominal Transplant, Department of General Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5073-4238
Phillipe AbreuDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6340-7738

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost reported experience with robotic kidney transplant (RKT) has been limited to right-sided graft implantation, with left-sided implantation considered technically challenging.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed consecutive left-sided RKTs at two transplant centres (01/2023-02/2026). A standardized operative technique with an accompanying surgical video is presented, and perioperative and postoperative outcomes are analysed.

resultsSeventeen patients underwent left-sided RKT. Fifteen were for retransplants, and two were for contraindications to right-sided implantation. Median warm ischaemia time was 37 min, operative time 229 min, and length of stay 4 days. No conversions to open surgery, intraoperative complications, or major postoperative complications occurred. Delayed graft function developed in five patients. At a median follow-up of 12.1 months, all patients were alive with functioning grafts.

conclusionsRKT with left-sided graft implantation is technically feasible and safe in experienced robotic transplant centres and was associated with favourable short-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcomeleft‐sided graft implantationminimally‐invasive surgeryredo transplantationrobotic kidney transplantationtransplant roboticsvascular anastomosis

Identifiers

PMID42592803
PMCPMC13470655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.