Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592742›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2026

Unified Brain Mechanisms Underlying the Processing of Word Order Permutations of Arguments and Adjuncts in Sentences.

Daiki Asami, Taiga Naoe, Michiru Makuuchi, Masatoshi Koizumi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daiki AsamiNational Institute of Informatics, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5707-7197
Taiga NaoeMedical Institute of Developmental Disabilities Research, Showa Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1016-3697
Michiru MakuuchiSection of Neuropsychology, Research Institute of National Rehabilitation Center for Persons With Disabilities, Tokorozawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3460-641X
Masatoshi KoizumiDepartment of Linguistics, Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0719-7128

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP19H00532Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP19H05589Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP24H00085Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP24K16067Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP26K00006Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP26K00007JSTS Moonshot R&D JPMJMS2292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human language often allows flexible word order in sentences with either an argument or an adjunct scrambled. This study examined brain mechanisms during the comprehension of such sentences in Japanese by conducting a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment. The imaging results revealed that regardless of whether arguments or adjuncts undergo scrambling, the comprehension of noncanonical word order sentences yields a higher brain activation than their canonical counterparts. Specifically, the activation was found in the left inferior frontal gyrus and the posterior superior temporal sulcus. The current results lend neurological support for the canonical versus noncanonical word order distinction in sentences with adjuncts, suggesting a unified explanation for the brain mechanisms for the processing of word order permutation in human language.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingComprehensionLanguageAdultFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOxygenYoung AdultOxygenadjunctsargumentsfMRIJapanesescramblingword order

Identifiers

PMID42592742
PMCPMC13470681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.