ArticlePublic health challenges2026
Qualitative Assessment of One Health Operationalization at the Central Level and in Two Border Districts of Sierra Leone.
Article in Public health challenges, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sociodemographic and Dog-Management Factors Associated With Free-Roaming Dogs in Nigeria and Sierra Leone.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Zoonotic diseases with epidemic potential pose a serious public health threat in Sierra Leone, where the One Health (OH) approach has been adopted to strengthen multi-sectoral preparedness and response. This study assessed the operationalization of OH in responding to such diseases at the central level and in two districts, Kambia and Kailahun, using content analysis of semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions and key documents. Manifest and latent analysis generated themes, including coordination and collaboration, surveillance and reporting, human resource capacity, communication, funding, and community engagement and awareness. Our study found that at the central level, OH sectors showed strong coordination, a functional surveillance system, established communication platforms and relatively strong capacity. District and community levels, by contrast, showed weak coordination, fragmented surveillance and limited communication, along with low animal health (AH) workforce capacity and OH awareness. Community level AH workers lacked an integrated approach to preventing, detecting and reporting zoonotic disease risks. Across all levels, OH activities lacked dedicated funding and relied solely on partner support, with the AH sector facing notable workforce shortages. OH, implementation was markedly weaker at district and community levels than at the central level, a disparity largely attributable to the absence of dedicated funding. Despite these gaps, the OH approach holds considerable potential for mitigating and managing zoonotic disease risks in Sierra Leone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.