ArticleCase reports in obstetrics and gynecology2026
Fluoroscopy-Guided Localization and Retrieval of a Migrated Extrapelvic Intrauterine Device: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fluoroscopy-Guided Localization and Retrieval of a Migrated Extrapelvic Intrauterine Device: A Case Report.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are widely used as a highly effective method of contraception. Although rare, uterine perforation is a serious complication, occurring in approximately 1 per 1000 insertions. This case underscores the value of laparoscopy in enabling accurate diagnosis and immediate removal of an occult extrauterine IUD migration. In addition, fluoroscopy guidance improves localization accuracy, facilitates precise retrieval, and may help prevent laparotomy. Case Presentation: This case presents a 25-year-old woman presented with progressive abdominal pain 1 year after IUD insertion. Physical examination revealed no involuntary guarding and the IUD strings were not visible. Transvaginal ultrasonography showed no evidence of a myometrial defect. An abdominal x-ray with uterine marker demonstrated extrapelvic migration of the IUD. The patient subsequently underwent fluoroscopy-assisted laparoscopic retrieval. Intraoperative findings revealed a uterine scar and dense adhesions between the IUD and the omentum. Conclusion: Early clinical suspicion and a structured imaging approach are essential for the diagnosis of extrauterine IUD migration. When pelvic ultrasonography is inconclusive, abdominal radiography with uterine markers can improve localization. Fluoroscopic guidance improves intraoperative localization and facilitates safe minimally invasive retrieval of extrapelvic IUD migration while minimizing surgical morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.