ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Emotional responses and engagement with misinformation in adolescents.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescents are increasingly exposed to misinformation in social media environments where emotionally salient content competes with verified information. While prior research has focused on credibility judgments, less is known about how emotional responses shape engagement with such content. This study examines how emotional responses influence adolescents' engagement with misinformation in a simulated social media context. A within-subject experiment was conducted with 44 Romanian high-school students (ages 16-19), who evaluated 18 war-related headlines presented in a feed-like format. Participants rated credibility, emotional responses, and their willingness to share and comment. Data were analyzed using mixed-effects models. Participants demonstrated baseline sensitivity to veracity, rating real headlines as more credible than false ones. However, engagement was more strongly associated with emotional responses than with perceived accuracy. High-arousal negative emotions-particularly fear and anger-predicted increased intentions to share and comment, whereas neutral responses were associated with minimal engagement. These findings show that adolescents' online behavior reflects a dissociation between credibility judgments and engagement, with emotional responses playing a catalysing role. The study contributes to misinformation research by integrating cognitive and affective processes within a single experimental framework and highlights the importance of addressing not only cognitive but also emotional responses in media literacy interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.