Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592527›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Emotional responses and engagement with misinformation in adolescents.

Ecaterina Ilis, Razvan Ilis, Katarzyna Molek-Kozakowska, Simina-Maria Terian

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ecaterina IlisFaculty of Letters and Arts, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania.
Razvan IlisFaculty of Social and Human Sciences, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania.
Katarzyna Molek-KozakowskaFaculty of Letters and Arts, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania.
Simina-Maria TerianFaculty of Letters and Arts, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescents are increasingly exposed to misinformation in social media environments where emotionally salient content competes with verified information. While prior research has focused on credibility judgments, less is known about how emotional responses shape engagement with such content. This study examines how emotional responses influence adolescents' engagement with misinformation in a simulated social media context. A within-subject experiment was conducted with 44 Romanian high-school students (ages 16-19), who evaluated 18 war-related headlines presented in a feed-like format. Participants rated credibility, emotional responses, and their willingness to share and comment. Data were analyzed using mixed-effects models. Participants demonstrated baseline sensitivity to veracity, rating real headlines as more credible than false ones. However, engagement was more strongly associated with emotional responses than with perceived accuracy. High-arousal negative emotions-particularly fear and anger-predicted increased intentions to share and comment, whereas neutral responses were associated with minimal engagement. These findings show that adolescents' online behavior reflects a dissociation between credibility judgments and engagement, with emotional responses playing a catalysing role. The study contributes to misinformation research by integrating cognitive and affective processes within a single experimental framework and highlights the importance of addressing not only cognitive but also emotional responses in media literacy interventions.

Indexed as

adolescentscredibilityemotionmisinformationnews literacyRussia–Ukraine warsocial media

Identifiers

PMID42592527
PMCPMC13464128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.