Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592509›Full record

ArticleAME case reports2026

Diagnostic and operative challenge of a giant non-pancreatic intra-abdominal pseudocyst: a rare case report.

Om Jhaveri, Katie Scott, Joseph Galloway

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in AME case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Om JhaveriDepartment of General Surgery, Alabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, AL, USA.
Katie ScottDepartment of General Surgery, Mobile Infirmary Medical Center, Mobile, AL, USA.
Joseph GallowayDepartment of General Surgery, Medical Center, Mobile Infirmary, Mobile, AL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Large, non-pancreatic pseudocysts are rare pathologies that present as lesions in the intra-abdominal wall or peritoneal cavity. These cases can be diagnostically difficult, particularly in situations where fine-needle aspiration yields nonspecific cytology and imaging is also often nonspecific and nondiagnostic. These lesions may mimic hematomas, seromas, cystic neoplasms, and other bowel-related pathologies, which may require surgical excision for definitive diagnosis and curative treatment. Case Description: We present a case of a 73-year-old male with a body mass index of 43 who presented to the emergency department for a ureteral stone and was found on computed tomography (CT) imaging incidentally to have a large left lower quadrant abdominal wall mass. The lesion was highly vascularized and intimately adherent to both the abdominal wall and colon. Two separate biopsy results showed nonspecific cytology and hemorrhagic debris. Operative excision required tedious removal from the bowel and abdominal wall and evacuation of 3 L of fluid. Pathology results showed a chronic pseudocyst lacking an epithelial lining. Conclusions: The case demonstrates the diagnostic limitations of fine-needle aspiration and imaging, along with the potential for abdominal pseudocysts to mimic multiple differentials. Additionally, it highlights the importance of complete surgical excision for diagnostic and curative treatment.

Indexed as

Abdominal pseudocystabdominal wall and general surgerycase reporthigh-volume pseudocystnon-pancreatic pseudocyst

Identifiers

PMID42592509
PMCPMC13466964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.