ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Didactic Education in Plastic Surgery Residency: A National Survey Highlighting Variation in Curriculum Structure and Assessment.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Didactic education is a core component of plastic surgery residency training and prepares residents for board certification and clinical practice. Despite its importance, no nationally standardized education curriculum exists, and contemporary data on educational practices remain limited. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to program directors and coordinators of American Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited US plastic surgery residency programs. Survey items assessed didactic structure, delivery format, curriculum design, exam preparation strategies, and perceived effectiveness. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results: Twenty-three programs responded (25.8% response rate). Programs reported a mean of 3.65 weekly didactic hours. All offered journal club, morbidity and mortality conference, and weekly teaching conferences, with variability in supplemental experiences such as simulation and cadaveric dissections. Most programs used hybrid in-person and virtual formats (60.9%), and none were exclusively virtual. Curricula were typically guided by program leadership (73.9%) and national resources such as the Plastic Surgery Education Network (69.6%). Formal postdidactic assessments and humanities-based curricula were uncommon. Although nearly all programs expected advance preparation (95.7%), few provided structured preparatory materials (17.4%). Only 2 programs encouraged the use of artificial intelligence-based tools. Over half of programs required a minimum plastic surgery in-service examination score (54.5%), with a mean percentile threshold of 32.5 indexed by resident year and track. Perceptions of the plastic surgery in-service examination's validity were mixed. Conclusions: Didactic education in plastic surgery residency remains heterogenous nationwide. Greater standardization, incorporation of structured assessment strategies, and thoughtful integration of emerging technologies may improve equity, enhance learning efficiency, and optimize resident preparation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.