Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592409›Full record

ArticleJournal of cytology

Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Hepatic Masses: A Retrospective Observational Study and Assessment of Risk of Malignancy Based on the Proposed World Health Organization Reporting System for Liver Cytology.

Neha Nigam, Neha Kumari, Jyoty Singh, Anil Singh, Nandita Chaudhary, Gaurav Pandey, Ram N Rao, Vinita Agrawal, Prabhakar Mishra, Nirbhay Kumar and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cytology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Neha NigamDepartment of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Neha KumariDepartment of Pathology, Dr. B. R. Ambedkar State Institute of Medical Sciences, Mohali, Punjab, India.
Jyoty SinghDepartment of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anil SinghDepartment of Radiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Nandita ChaudharyDepartment of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Gaurav PandeyDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ram N RaoDepartment of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Vinita AgrawalDepartment of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Prabhakar MishraDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Nirbhay KumarDepartment of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Amit RastogiDepartment of Anesthesia, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hepatic masses present a diagnostic challenge due to their variable etiology and overlapping imaging features. While radiology plays a pivotal role in lesion detection and characterization, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a rapid and minimally invasive method. This study reclassifies liver FNAC cases using the World Health Organization (WHO) Reporting System for Liver Cytology and assesses the diagnostic performance and risk of malignancy (ROM) for each category. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 1741 ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations performed on hepatic lesions over 8 years at a tertiary care center. Cytological specimens were reclassified into WHO categories: nondiagnostic, benign, atypical, suspicious for malignancy, and malignant. Histopathology follow-up served as the reference standard. Diagnostic metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy, were calculated. ROM was determined for each cytological category. Results: Of the 1741 FNAC cases, 1660 yielded adequate material. Malignant lesions constituted the majority ( Conclusion: FNAC, particularly when classified according to the WHO system, demonstrates high diagnostic accuracy and predictive reliability for hepatic space-occupying lesions. Standardized application of the WHO reporting framework enables objective ROM stratification and facilitates effective clinical decision-making. FNAC remains a vital diagnostic tool in the evaluation of hepatic masses, especially in resource-limited or time-sensitive settings.

Indexed as

Cytologylivermalignancymassmetastaticrisk of malignancyWHO

Identifiers

PMID42592409
PMCPMC13466688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.