ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Tooth-Specific Personalization of In-Office Whitening Time: A Three-Case Report.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tooth-Specific Personalization of In-Office Whitening Time: A Three-Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dental sensitivity during or after tooth whitening is a common adverse effect that may compromise patient comfort and treatment acceptance. This case report descriptively evaluated three patients who underwent in-office whitening with a calcium-containing 35% hydrogen peroxide gel, applied in three sessions at 7-day intervals. A differential protocol was adopted, with reduced application time (from 40 to 20 min) according to tooth group, particularly for incisors, in an attempt to minimize sensitivity in teeth with reduced enamel and dentin thickness. Despite this adjustment, all patients reported some degree of sensitivity, predominantly in mandibular incisors, ranging from mild to severe. Notably, a homogeneous aesthetic outcome was achieved across different dental groups, even with reduced exposure times. Although color change and sensitivity distribution were assessed qualitatively, the findings provide clinical insight into the influence of anatomical variability on bleaching response. All patients reported high satisfaction with the aesthetic results. Within the limitations of this case report, reducing application time alone was insufficient to control sensitivity, suggesting that additional strategies may be required, particularly for thinner teeth. This approach may support the development of more individualized bleaching protocols based on dental characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.