Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592361›Full record

ReviewAntibody therapeutics2026

From T cell engagers to next-generation immune cell engagers for cancer immunotherapy.

Zaopeng Yang, Yang-Xin Fu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibody therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zaopeng YangChangping Laboratory, Beijing 102206, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8824-7668
Yang-Xin FuChangping Laboratory, Beijing 102206, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immune cell engagers have emerged as a powerful class of multi-specific therapeutics that redirect immune effector cells toward tumor cells to induce targeted cytotoxicity. Among these, T cell engagers (TCEs) represent the most clinically advanced platform, with multiple approved agents demonstrating substantial efficacy in hematologic malignancies. However, their broader application remains limited by systemic toxicities, antigen heterogeneity, and reduced efficacy in solid tumors. To address these challenges, next-generation TCEs are being engineered with improved selectivity, and optimized signaling properties. In parallel, increasing attention has shifted toward engaging alternative immune effectors, including γδ T cells, natural killer cells, and myeloid populations, which provide complementary mechanisms of tumor recognition and immune modulation. In this Review, we summarize the biological principles underlying T or other immune cell engagers, highlight emerging alternative platforms, and discuss evolving engineering strategies that are shaping the future of programmable cancer immunotherapy.

Indexed as

cancer immunotherapyimmune cell engagersmyeloid cell engagersNK cell engagersT cell engagersγδ T cells

Identifiers

PMID42592361
PMCPMC13463642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.