Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592296›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Pancreatic Collision Tumor Composed of Solid Pseudopapillary Neoplasm and Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor: Diagnostic Challenges and Classification Considerations.

Jose Valentin Lopez, Nian Jiang, David Cartwright, Khalid Amin, Diana Oramas Mogrovejo, Ismail Elbaz Younes, Robben Schat, Eric Jensen, Byoung Uk Park

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jose Valentin LopezDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Nian JiangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
David CartwrightDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Khalid AminDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Diana Oramas MogrovejoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Ismail Elbaz YounesDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Robben SchatDepartment of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Eric JensenDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.
Byoung Uk ParkDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collision tumors are uncommon neoplasms composed of two histologically distinct tumor populations occurring within the same anatomic site while maintaining separate boundaries. Pancreatic collision tumors composed of solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) and well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PanNET) are rare and may be diagnostically challenging because these entities can show overlapping morphologic and immunophenotypic features and may radiographically present as a single lesion. A 41-year-old woman presented with left upper quadrant abdominal pain and was found to have a pancreatic head mass. Fine-needle aspiration favored SPN, and the patient underwent extended pancreaticoduodenectomy. Histologic examination demonstrated a 3.7 cm SPN and an adjacent 0.6 cm World Health Organization grade 1 PanNET, separated by an abrupt interface without appreciable intermingling. Immunohistochemistry showed nuclear β-catenin and cyclin D1 expression in the SPN, while the PanNET showed diffuse chromogranin and INSM1 expression with retained membranous E-cadherin. Synaptophysin was positive in both tumors, highlighting a diagnostic pitfall. Eighteen lymph nodes were negative for metastatic disease, and both tumors were confined to the pancreas. This case represents the fourth reported pancreatic SPN-WDNET collision tumor and highlights important diagnostic and classification challenges in pancreatic neoplasms that demonstrate dual differentiation. Because SPNs may exhibit partial neuroendocrine differentiation, neuroendocrine marker positivity alone should not be used to establish a diagnosis of WDNET in the setting of SPN. Instead, accurate classification requires careful integration of histomorphology and complementary immunophenotypic findings.

Indexed as

differential diagnosisfine-needle aspirationimmunohistochemistrypancreatic collision tumorpancreatic cytologypancreatic neoplasmssolid pseudopapillary neoplasmsynaptophysinwell-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor

Identifiers

PMID42592296
PMCPMC13464359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.