ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2026
Public knowledge of plantar fasciitis and its determinants in Saudi Arabia: A national cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Plantar fasciitis (PF) is a leading cause of heel pain globally, imposing a significant burden on quality of life. Despite its high prevalence in Saudi Arabia, data regarding public awareness of its etiology, risk factors, and preventive measures remain limited. Understanding these gaps is essential for designing effective health education strategies. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate public knowledge of plantar fasciitis, its risk factors, and preventive measures among adults in Saudi Arabia. Material and Methods: An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted, including 1,032 Saudi adults aged 18 years and older. Data were collected using an online questionnaire. The instrument comprised five sections: (1) demographic characteristics; (2) general knowledge, risk factors, and clinical features of PF; (3) sources of knowledge; (4) knowledge about treatment options; and (5) knowledge of preventive measures. Each knowledge item used a three-point response format (Yes/No/I do not know), and correct answers were scored as "1," while incorrect and "I do not know" responses were scored as "0." The questionnaire was administered in Arabic, and participation was voluntary and anonymous. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were employed to assess differences in knowledge scores by demographic variables and information sources. Results: The analysis included 1,032 participants (59.5% male, 40.5% female). The most frequently reported information sources were the Internet (60.9%) and social media (57.2%), while professional sources were less common. Participants demonstrated moderate overall knowledge, scoring highest in treatment awareness (55.7%) and lowest in clinical features (44.7%). Of note, demographic disparities were observed: females exhibited higher mean knowledge scores than males (55.4% vs. 47.3%, Conclusion: Public knowledge of PI in Saudi Arabia is satisfactory overall, with notable deficits in understanding specific clinical symptoms and preventive strategies. While the public relies heavily on digital media for health information, this reliance is associated with lower knowledge levels compared to professional consultation. Based on these findings, we recommend integrating professional medical expertise into digital channels and employing multi-platform awareness campaign strategies to enhance public understanding and ensure high-quality information reaches the wider population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.