Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592202›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law2026

Developing an 'Insider Language Index' as a composite measure to detect insider threat.

Natasha G Martlew, Linden J Ball, Coral J Dando, Thomas C Ormerod, Paul J Taylor, Tarek Menacere, Alexandra L Sandham, Beth H Richardson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry, psychology, and law : an interdisciplinary journal of the Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natasha G MartlewSchool of Psychology & Humanities, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Linden J BallSchool of Psychology & Humanities, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5099-0124
Coral J DandoDepartment of Psychology, University of Westminster, London, UK.
Thomas C OrmerodThomas C. Ormerod, School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.
Paul J TaylorDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Tarek MenacereDepartment of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Alexandra L SandhamDepartment of Psychology, University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, UK.
Beth H RichardsonSchool of Psychology & Humanities, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Of all the issues that confront modern organisations, insider threat is one of the most challenging in terms of impact and mitigation. Typically, research has focused on defining what insider threat is and determining how such threats can be detected through technology. We suggest that technological approaches to insider-threat detection can be complemented through a greater focus on investigating the linguistic behaviours associated with insider activity. Research has highlighted that an individual's use of language offers a potential means of identifying insiders. Using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, this study analysed the language used by insiders and non-insiders during workplace interviews. Results revealed that, compared to non-insiders, insiders used significantly more words relating to cognitive processing, significantly more self-referential terms, and significantly more negative emotion words. Based on these findings, a generalisable Insider Language Index (ILI) was developed that has the potential to support insider detection in organisational contexts.

Indexed as

cognitive processingdeceptioninsider threatlanguage usemitigationnegative emotionpronoun usethreat detection

Identifiers

PMID42592202
PMCPMC13463435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.