Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592127›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026

Federated learning for privacy-preserving ophthalmic artificial intelligence: clinical applications and translational challenges.

Yuan Wei, Kaikai Zhao, Andrzej Grzybowski, Kai Jin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuan WeiEye Center of Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Kaikai ZhaoEye Center of Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Andrzej GrzybowskiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Kai JinEye Center of Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) is increasingly relevant to ophthalmology because retinal photographs, optical coherence tomography (OCT), OCT angiography, visual fields, and linked clinical records are clinically valuable but difficult to pool across institutions. In this narrative review, we synthesize ophthalmology-focused FL literature across diabetic retinopathy (DR), glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), pediatric retinal disease, multi-disease retinal diagnostics, and emerging ophthalmic platforms. Current evidence suggests that FL can support collaborative AI development without centralizing raw patient data, and selected studies show performance close to centralized training under controlled retrospective or multicenter experimental conditions. For example, multicenter glaucoma detection from volumetric OCT achieved an AUC of 0.92 with FL compared with 0.94 for centralized training. However, FL is privacy-enhancing rather than privacy-complete, and most ophthalmic FL systems have not yet undergone prospective clinical validation. Model updates may remain vulnerable to gradient inversion, membership inference, poisoning, site-level bias, and latent identity or attribute leakage. For eye-care networks, the main value of FL is therefore not simply algorithmic performance but a governance model for privacy-conscious collaboration. Prospective validation, interoperability, explainability, workflow integration, privacy auditing, and clear responsibility for monitoring are needed before FL-enabled ophthalmic AI can be deployed routinely.

Indexed as

data securityfederated learningophthalmologyoptical coherence tomographyretinal imaging

Identifiers

PMID42592127
PMCPMC13463149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.