ArticleJDS communications2026
Optimizing temperate pasture-based systems through strategic selection of forage plants.
Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Tea Tree Essential Oil Enriches Lactic Acid Bacteria and Improves Paper Mulberry Silage Quality.Microorganisms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This mini-review examines the history and evolution of temperate pasture forage plant selection, from the diverse meadow-inspired mixtures of the 17th century to the simplified perennial ryegrass-based pastures from the early 20th century onward. Climate change, environmental pressures, and market expectations have driven a renewed interest in diverse and alternative pasture systems as a means of enhancing pasture productivity and resilience. However, challenges persist regarding the scale, scope, and transferability of research findings to commercial grazing conditions. We propose a pragmatic, science-based framework that prioritizes functional trait diversity over species richness, guiding farmers to define clear objectives, identify constraints, and select a modest number of complementary species and cultivars based on site-specific conditions and management capacity. This approach recognizes that meaningful functional benefits arise from strategic species and cultivar selection rather than simply increasing species number. We review some existing forage selection tools, noting their value and highlighting their limitations in addressing diverse pastures and holistic environmental objectives. Future advances should integrate resilience traits, ecosystem services, and management considerations into decision-support tools that are co-developed with farmers, researchers, and rural professionals to ensure that biological complexity remains practical and economically viable within pastoral systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.