Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592114›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2026

Optimizing temperate pasture-based systems through strategic selection of forage plants.

Daniel J Donaghy, J Eruera Tait-Jamieson, Keith G Pembleton, Donita L Cartmill, Samuel S Wilson, Michael Egan, Varthani Susruthan, Rebekah L Wood, Nerissa J Edwards, Robert C Southward and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Daniel J DonaghySchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4412, New Zealand.
J Eruera Tait-JamiesonSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4412, New Zealand.
Keith G PembletonCentre of Sustainable Agricultural Systems, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba Queensland, 4350, Australia.
Donita L CartmillSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4412, New Zealand.
Samuel S WilsonSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4412, New Zealand.
Michael EganTeagasc Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Cork P61 P302, Ireland.
Varthani SusruthanSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4412, New Zealand.
Rebekah L WoodSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4412, New Zealand.
Nerissa J EdwardsSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4412, New Zealand.
Robert C SouthwardSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4412, New Zealand.
Mark A OsborneSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4412, New Zealand.
Andrew D CartmillSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North, 4412, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This mini-review examines the history and evolution of temperate pasture forage plant selection, from the diverse meadow-inspired mixtures of the 17th century to the simplified perennial ryegrass-based pastures from the early 20th century onward. Climate change, environmental pressures, and market expectations have driven a renewed interest in diverse and alternative pasture systems as a means of enhancing pasture productivity and resilience. However, challenges persist regarding the scale, scope, and transferability of research findings to commercial grazing conditions. We propose a pragmatic, science-based framework that prioritizes functional trait diversity over species richness, guiding farmers to define clear objectives, identify constraints, and select a modest number of complementary species and cultivars based on site-specific conditions and management capacity. This approach recognizes that meaningful functional benefits arise from strategic species and cultivar selection rather than simply increasing species number. We review some existing forage selection tools, noting their value and highlighting their limitations in addressing diverse pastures and holistic environmental objectives. Future advances should integrate resilience traits, ecosystem services, and management considerations into decision-support tools that are co-developed with farmers, researchers, and rural professionals to ensure that biological complexity remains practical and economically viable within pastoral systems.

Identifiers

PMID42592114
PMCPMC13464189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.