ArticleJDS communications2026
Welfare indicators for young dairy heifers managed with virtual fencing in northern Sweden.
Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effects of virtual fencing (VF) on welfare indicators (i.e., BW, behavior, and hair cortisol) of young dairy heifers under northern Swedish conditions. Thirty heifers aged 126 to 294 d at the beginning of the experiment were allocated into 2 groups (n = 15): a control group managed with physical electric fencing, and a VF group. All heifers were fitted with VF collars before acclimatization on pasture. The 110-d experiment included a 5-d acclimatization period followed by three 35-d grazing periods conducted in different paddock areas (full paddock, one side, and the opposite side), each comprising a 6-d learning phase and a 29-d post-learning phase. Collar data for the VF group were analyzed for each learning phase and subsequent days in each period. Animal behavior was evaluated as scan sampling observations. Herbage samples were collected at the start and end of each period to evaluate herbage mass and chemical composition for potential pasture utilization assessment for both groups. The heifers were weighed at the beginning and at the end of the trial, and tail hair samples were collected at the end of the experiment for cortisol analysis. Over the course of the experiment the number of recorded audio cues increased and electrical pulses decreased. No significant differences were observed in behaviors such as grazing or lying down ruminating between the VF and control groups, nor were there significant differences in herbage mass or composition. Body weight gain was lower and hair cortisol concentrations were significantly higher for heifers managed with VF. Virtual fencing collars maintained reliable functionality throughout the 110-d trial under summer grazing conditions, and heifers aged 6 to 9 mo rapidly learned and adapted to the system. Although slightly higher cortisol concentrations and differences in growth were observed in the VF group, no behavioral evidence of impaired welfare was detected. Overall, VF demonstrated functional reliability under practical conditions; however, further research is needed to clarify the physiological and welfare implications of VF use in young heifers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.