Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592086›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2026

Transition cow nutrition for grazing herds: Practical priorities for health and performance.

Mallory Crookenden, Axel Heiser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mallory CrookendenAgResearch Group, Bioeconomy Science Institute, Christchurch, New Zealand 7608.
Axel HeiserAgResearch Group, Bioeconomy Science Institute, Christchurch, New Zealand 7608.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transition period, encompassing the 3 wk before and 3 wk after calving, represents the most metabolically and immunologically demanding phase of the dairy cow's lactation cycle. Despite lower milk yield targets, grazing cows experience homeorhetic adaptations and immune perturbations comparable in magnitude to those of high-yielding, TMR-fed cows. However, pasture-based systems impose distinct management constraints that necessitate a pragmatic, rather than precision-focused, approach to nutritional management. This review synthesizes recent evidence on transition physiology in grazing systems and examines strategies that account for inherent pasture variability while maximizing on-farm achievability. The evidence demonstrates that optimal BCS at calving, controlled prepartum energy restriction to 80% to 100% of requirements, and focused mineral supplementation, particularly magnesium and calcium, remain the most cost-effective determinants of transition success. Secondary strategies, including targeted fatty acid supplementation, may provide additional benefits but should complement, not replace, foundational management. Emerging precision technologies offer promise for identifying individual cows at risk before clinical disease manifests, yet their utility in grazing systems depends on integration with variable pasture quality and realistic labor constraints. This review emphasizes that pragmatic, fundamentals-first management, aligned with seasonal pasture dynamics and farm-specific constraints, offers the most reliable pathway to improved transition outcomes, reduced metabolic disease, and sustainable dairy production in grazing systems.

Identifiers

PMID42592086
PMCPMC13464193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.