ArticleiScience2026
AgroPatch AutoStrike for adversarial patch attacks on plant disease detection models.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant diseases threaten food security and cause substantial economic losses, motivating artificial intelligence for automated detection. Although vision transformers (ViTs) have shown promising performance in agriculture, their vulnerability to adversarial patch attacks remains underexplored. Existing patch attacks developed for generic images are less effective for plant disease images. We propose AgroPatch-AutoStrike (APA), an adversarial patch attack framework for ViT-based plant disease detection. APA combines the variance driven feature patch attack (VDFPA) with the adversarial focal loss (AFL) to improve patch placement and emphasize hard to attack categories. On the cassava leaf disease dataset, APA reduces the robust accuracy (RA) of most ViT models to nearly zero using four patches covering 2% of the image. Compared with patch-fool and LaVAN, APA achieves 1-2% lower RA with comparable inference time. These findings reveal robustness gaps in plant disease detection models and support domain specific adversarial robustness evaluation for agricultural AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.