ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2026
Postoperative pain after vNOTES versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: A procedure-specific comparative study.
Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is associated with lower postoperative pain, reduced analgesic requirements, and faster early postoperative recovery compared with laparoscopy in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications. To compare postoperative pain and early recovery outcomes between vNOTES and conventional laparoscopy in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications. Materials and Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included 192 patients who underwent hysterectomy between March 2021 and September 2025. Patients were grouped according to surgical approach (vNOTES vs. laparoscopy). Postoperative pain was assessed using the visual analog scale at 6 and 24 hours. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and the requirement for additional analgesia. Secondary outcomes included operative time, change in hemoglobin, time to first flatus, and length of hospital stay. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors of analgesic requirement. Results: Of 192 patients, 75 (39.1%) underwent laparoscopy and 117 (60.9%) underwent vNOTES. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The vNOTES group had significantly lower pain scores at 6 and 24 hours (p=0.001) and a reduced need for additional analgesia (23.9% vs. 60.0%, p=0.001). Operative time was shorter and recovery outcomes, including time to first flatus and length of hospital stay, were significantly improved in the vNOTES group (p=0.001). Surgical approach, uterine weight, and operative time were independent predictors of analgesic requirement. Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort study, vNOTES was associated with lower postoperative pain scores, reduced analgesic requirement, and earlier recovery than conventional laparoscopy. These findings should be confirmed in prospective randomized studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.