Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592045›Full record

ArticleTranslational pediatrics2026

Effects of two securement methods on peripherally inserted central catheter stability and skin integrity in very low birth weight infants: a retrospective study.

Xin Liu, Fuqiang Sun, Na Tang, Huannong Cui, Yang Duan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xin LiuDepartment of Neonatology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3643-4501
Fuqiang SunDepartment of Neonatology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6559-2188
Na TangDepartment of Neonatology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6559-2188
Huannong CuiDepartment of Neonatology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6559-2188
Yang DuanDepartment of Neonatology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6559-2188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Very low birth weight infants often require peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) for long-term venous access. Conventional securement methods are associated with high rates of catheter dislodgement and skin injury, but the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of modified combination securement methods remain insufficiently validated. This study aimed to investigate the effects of a novel combination securement method on catheter dislodgement and skin injury in very low birth weight infants (VLBWIs) undergoing PICC placement, and to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis to inform evidence-based selection of the optimal securement strategy. Methods: This retrospective, single-center analysis comprised 181 VLBWIs who underwent PICC placement in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between January 2018 and December 2025. Infants were assigned to either a conventional securement group (conventional group) or a modified combination fixation group (modified group), the latter consisting of four steps: pressure relief protection, tension-free fixation, buffer reinforcement, and sealing coverage (termed 'protection-pressure reduction-fixation-sealing'). A 1:1 nearest-neighbor propensity score matching (PSM) approach was used to balance baseline confounders. After matching, clinical outcomes and direct medical costs were compared between groups, and correlations between cost metrics and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Following matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups, with no significant differences (all P>0.05). The modified group showed significantly lower rates of unplanned PICC removal and skin injury than the conventional group (P=0.02 and P<0.001, respectively). Logistic regression identified the modified securement method as an independent protective factor against unplanned PICC removal in VLBWIs [odds ratio (OR) =0.275, P=0.005]. Moreover, total direct medical cost per PICC placement was significantly lower in the modified group (P<0.001). Conclusions: The modified combination securement method significantly improves clinical outcomes associated with PICC placement in VLBWIs, reduces complication rates, and achieves overall cost savings. Offering both clinical and economic benefits, this approach warrants widespread adoption in the NICU.

Indexed as

catheter dislodgementcost-effectiveness analysisneonatal intensive care unit (NICU)peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)Very low birth weight infants (VLBWIs)

Identifiers

PMID42592045
PMCPMC13462852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.