Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592032›Full record

ArticleAntibody therapeutics2026

Generative AI-driven

Yixin Qian, Youxin Feng, Ming Zou, Huiyu Cai, Jintong Ye, Teng Song, Ping Li, Jian Tang, Mi Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibody therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yixin QianDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing 100191, PR China.
Youxin FengState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Frontiers Science Center for Cancer Integrative Omics, Peking University International Cancer Institute, Peking University, Beijing 100191, PR China.
Ming ZouDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing 100191, PR China.
Huiyu CaiBioGeometry, Beijing 100083, PR China.
Jintong YeBioGeometry, Beijing 100083, PR China.
Teng SongBioGeometry, Beijing 100083, PR China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6636-8559
Ping LiBioGeometry, Beijing 100083, PR China.
Jian TangBioGeometry, Beijing 100083, PR China.
Mi DengDepartment of Immunology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing 100191, PR China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4291-0144

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: CD93 is an emerging immune checkpoint. Blocking its interaction with insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7 (IGFBP7) restores antitumor immunity, yet discovering high-affinity antibodies against this specific functional epitope remains a formidable challenge for traditional methods. Methods: We employed a proprietary generative artificial intelligence (AI) model, GeoFlow, to Results: To dissect the contribution of endothelial CD93 to immunotherapy resistance, we utilized an endothelial-specific conditional knockout model in MB49 bladder cancer, where the loss of endothelial CD93 significantly sensitized tumors to PD-1 inhibition. The genetic findings identified endothelial CD93 as a fundamental driver of immunotherapy resistance and provided the rationale for our GeoFlow generative AI platform, which was employed to Conclusions: This study validated generative AI for designing epitope-specific antibodies with superior potency, offering a robust candidate for next-generation immunotherapy.

Indexed as

AI-driven de novo design antibodyCD93endothelial cellsIGFBP7immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42592032
PMCPMC13463625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.