Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42592026›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology reports2026

A prospective algorithm for pre-operative risk stratification and individualized lymph node assessment in patients with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN).

Pamela N Peters, Lauren March, Georgia D Smith, Elizabeth A Bloom, Rebecca A Previs, Angeles Alvarez Secord, Laura J Havrilesky, Emma C Rossi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pamela N PetersSutter East Bay Medical Group, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.
Lauren MarchDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Georgia D SmithDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Elizabeth A BloomDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Rebecca A PrevisDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Angeles Alvarez SecordDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Laura J HavrileskyDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Emma C RossiDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The standard of care surgical management of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN) is debated. Because EIN carries a 35-40% risk of underlying carcinoma, omission of lymph node sampling can result in incomplete staging. However, lymph node assessment for all patients results in overtreatment for those without cancer. We developed a preoperative risk-based algorithm to direct sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in EIN. Methods: Patients with EIN planning hysterectomy were treated prospectively according to our algorithm. Patients with an endometrial stripe (EMS) ≥ 15 mm by pre-operative ultrasound or "EIN-cannot rule out carcinoma" on pathology underwent indocyanine green (ICG) injection and SLNB. Patients with EMS < 15 mm underwent hysterectomy without SLNB. Results: From August 2022-November 2023, 50 patients with EIN underwent hysterectomy. 48% (24/50) had cancer on final pathology, and 16% (8/50) had high-risk cancers (defined as meeting high-intermediate risk criteria for adjuvant radiation, high grade histology, or stage II or higher). SLNB was performed in 92% (22/24) of patients with cancer, including 100% (8/8) with high-risk cancers. Surgical decision making based on the algorithm had 92% sensitivity for achieving surgical staging of cancer and 100% sensitivity for staging high-risk cancers. The negative predictive value of the algorithm (NPV) to correctly identify patients without cancer was 89%. Conclusions: A preoperative risk-based algorithm using EMS and pathology results has high sensitivity to identify and direct nodal assessment for patients with EIN at higher risk for endometrial cancer. The algorithm may allow for de-escalation and individualization of surgical treatment for EIN.

Indexed as

Endometrial cancerEndometrial intraepithelial neoplasiaEndometrial stripePelvic ultrasoundSentinel lymph node biopsySurgical staging

Identifiers

PMID42592026
PMCPMC13463969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.